Posts Tagged ‘cruelty’

11 March was a historic date – it marked the day that the European Union implemented its landmark ban on selling animal-tested cosmetics. Please join SAFE in calling for New Zealand to urgently do the same!

No cosmetic testing!

In the meantime, we need to be proactive ourselves – but how do you make sure you’re not hurting animals whilst being mindful of a small budget? We all love a bit of luxury in our lives, but sometimes cost can be a concern for many of us. The great news is that cruelty-free products are easier than ever to find and you really don’t have to spend a fortune! Here are just a few of my favourite ‘not tested on animals’, SAFE Shopper budget buys that you can find locally or order online.

If you are ever unsure about which brands are not tested on animals, SAFE makes it easy for you with SAFE Shopper, an online searchable list and downloadable booklet of products available in New Zealand. Check it out at safeshopper.org.nz!

SAFEShopper

Lush
We love Lush at SAFE. Not only do they sell great products, they have a fantastic history of campaigning actively against cosmetic animal testing. As anyone who has walked past a Lush store knows, it all smells amazing too! I especially love the solid perfumes at $10.90 and their solid shampoo bars that seem to last forever. Order online or buy in-store.

E.L.F. Cosmetics
Until now we had to make do with ordering Eyes Lips Face products from Australia but now E.L.F. has their own New Zealand website. With an all-vegan range and eyeliners and lipsticks for just $5, it’s not to be missed! You can also still order from Elf Australia.

Nature’s Organics
Natures Organics sells a range of shower gels, shampoos and conditioners that are organic and vegan, use plant-based packaging – AND are only around $6 a bottle in The Warehouse and supermarkets like Countdown.

Ro-Vie Cosmetics
Ro-Vie Cosmetics sells gorgeous products that are vegan and contain no nasty chemicals. Although slightly more pricey at $20 for an eye shadow, they promise to last for one year with every-day application. Bargain!

ecostore
I love ecostore products. Especially their household range which start at just $6 for washing powder which lasts 64 washes! Available to buy online, in wholefoods stores and supermarkets.

For even more thriftiness, check out SAFE’s ever-growing DIY Cosmetics Pinterest board.

Why not post your favourite SAFE Shopper beauty finds in the comments below? Happy shopping!

Mandy Carter

Campaign Manager

The discovery of horsemeat labelled as beef in burgers and ready-made meals in the UK and parts of Europe is the scandal that keeps on giving with major supermarkets and fast food joints like Burger King now involved.

HorsesCuddleThe story has also hit headlines in New Zealand with media pondering whether the same thing could happen here. The Herald reports, “It isn’t illegal to hide horsemeat in food in New Zealand, under the generic label ‘meat’. This is a significant loophole, and means that consumers who eat pies or sausages, for example, could unknowingly be consuming horsemeat.”

It seems some of us share the same dietary taboos as the Brits and would be horrified at being duped into eating something considered unsavoury. But why the double standards ? Why is horsemeat so unpalatable compared to that from other equally hooved and intelligent animals like cows and pigs (who are, incidentally, cleverer than your dog or three-year-old child). And aren’t we missing another important point in all this? – That of the welfare of the horses? Why are so many ending up at the slaughterhouse – even in New Zealand?

Whether horsemeat is being mislabelled here or not, there’s a bigger scandal already happening – one with links to the racing industry and shrouded in secrecy.

Action of a bunch of race horses during a race head-on.Down in the depths of the South Island lies the little known ‘Clover Exports Limited’ (surely a cruel pun on ‘putting a horse out to clover’), the only horse slaughterhouse in New Zealand licensed to export horsemeat “for human consumption”. Horses, mainly rejects from the racing industry, are being killed at Clover Exports and eaten in Europe – and New Zealand. Last year The Herald told how Gore is often the destination for New Zealand racing industry thoroughbreds who don’t perform. In an industry driven by profit, when animals can no longer make money their days are numbered. They’re cruelly discarded and stacked into cattle trucks for the arduous journey to slaughter – which can often take many days. In 2011, 1962 horses were slaughtered at Clover Exports.

If we love horses so much that we find it unpalatable to eat them, what do we think about exploiting them for the racing industry and then discarding them when they’re no use anymore?

It shows again our strange relationship with animals: once they’ve served ‘their purpose’ as prized racehorses, they’re relegated to being just food. But the industry knows the truth is unpalatable to most of the public so they’ll do anything to hide the fact that racing horses will share the same sad end designed for all animals to be consumed. Pigs, chickens and cows, like horses, are all sensitive animals with their own personalities, able to experience fear, stress, pain and suffering. Yet millions of them are killed for the meat industry every year, and millions more are suffering in factory farms right now. Why is that ok and eating horsemeat is not?

If the horsemeat scandal has made us feel queasy, it might be time to challenge the old-fashioned view that animals exist solely for human use. Maybe we need to think again – to see all animals’ inherent worth, a value completely separate from their usefulness to humans. Then all we need to do is to stop eating them!

Mandy Carter, Campaign Manager

A new phase of SAFE’s Stop Factory Farming campaign is about to begin and we need your help!

Colony cage, New Zealand

Our current National Party Government seems hell-bent on allowing the introduction of the new but still-cruel colony cage systemsfor layer hens. This means that these animals will continue to suffer for many more decades to come.

We can still stop this!

One thing guaranteed in politics is that governments change. We want to find out from the Leader of the Opposition, whether the Labour Party agrees with SAFE that colony cages are cruel and do not allow the hens to express their normal behaviour as required by the Animal Welfare Act.

Labour needs to take a stance against colony cages – then the egg industry will think twice before investing millions of dollars in a system that could be banned by the next government!

So get active and send your e-card to the party leaders at stopfactoryfarming.org.nz. You can also write to David Shearer personally and urge him to take a stand for animal welfare by rejecting colony cages.

Despite making sympathetic noises, a real policy commitment from the Labour

Party on colony cages is presently lacking. SAFE is especially keen that more letters, emails and e-cards get to leader David Shearer to ask him where he stands.

While the current government may not do right by the animals, we must ensure that the next one will. Your help is crucial: without it, the hens may never get out!

Hans Kriek, SAFE Executive director

Pigs in cages so small they can’t even turn around? Chickens selectively bred for meat to put on weight so quickly they’ve become genetic monstrosities who wouldn’t survive even if rescued? Hens imprisoned for life unable to display their most basic natural behaviours? Modern day turkeys so heavy they can’t even breed naturally? This is factory farming – New Zealand’s dirty little secret.

Our clean, green image belies the fact that each year we abuse 100 million animals bred for food in factory farms. Animals are confined in windowless, overcrowded sheds, all in the pursuit of profit. Industries want us to buy more, eat more, consume more – and make them a bigger buck – with the true cost being to the animals.

                                                                                                                                                “Whenever people say, “We mustn’t be sentimental,” you can take it they are about to do
something cruel. And if they add, “We must be realistic,” they mean
they are going to make money out of it.”

- Brigid Brophy (1929-1995)

It’s not good for the animals, the environment, our health, New Zealand’s 100% pure reputation – or even farmers themselves. link?

Intensive farming has become such big business it has affected small scale farming too ­ in the 1980s there were over 450 egg producers in New Zealand. By 2000 only 130 were left, with the largest 20 producers accounting for over 50% of total production.

Factory farming simply does not fit in with the kiwi ideal of ‘fairness’.

It has to stop.


Let down by the Law

SAFE has been working hard on the Animal Welfare Act review, underway until the end of September. There is an opportunity for real change, for us to truly become leaders in animal welfare. You can make a submission on this now!

However, even the current inadequate Act states that animals must have the ability to display normal behaviours, but still allows the worst factory farming practices such as battery hen farming and farrowing crates by which animals are clearly deprived. Even worse, proposed changes, if accepted, will mean a huge step backwards – allowing cruel practices to be exempt from animal welfare obligations indefinitely.

It’s clear we can’t sit by idly waiting for politicians to do the right thing.

We need to take action now; real action that will stop the horrors of factory farming. This starts with YOU.

A new campaign

SAFE has long campaigned against our abusive farming practices, achieving a ban on cruel sow stalls (which begins 2016). Now we’re launching a new Stop Factory Farming campaign which aims to turn the spotlight on other cruel practices in intensive farming in New Zealand!

Urging consumers to think before they buy, we want you to participate in bringing factory farming to an end. We’ll be bringing this message to New Zealanders through a major national drive involving television advertisements, billboards, posters and bus adverts. SAFE will be showing that YOUR consumer purchasing power can stop factory farming.

Think before you Buy!

Together, the individual actions of ordinary New Zealanders can stop factory farm cruelty.

By simply taking the following steps we can make a difference:

Take a stand when you shop! Don’t buy eggs from caged hens or factory-farmed pork and chicken. Imagine what would happen if each of us stopped buying these products – factory farming would stop overnight.

Spread the message: talk to family and friends about cruel factory farming. Encourage your workplace or school to stop using factory-farmed products.

There is loads more you can do; this is only the beginning.

Say NO to factory farming, find out more and get involved at StopFactoryFarming.org.nz

Mandy Carter, Campaign manager

[As printed in the Taranaki Daily Times, 16 August]

In his story on the growing rural urban divide, Matt Rilkoff explored just one side of the story (Rural-urban worlds apart, Taranaki Daily Times, 16 August). While it is true that urban populations are now out of touch with where their food comes from, he missed out another part of the equation: rural communities are themselves in danger of losing touch with new social realities, causing inevitable confusion.

The macabre ‘‘possum dress-ups’’ fundraising event was reported internationally, with accompanying photos, and did not display rural life in a good light – the consequent backlash was an honest reaction by many to images that were truly objectionable.

Besides the lack of any respect shown to the dead animals, what was also disturbing afterwards was the apparent lack of self-awareness by the school management once it hit the headlines. There seemed to be no realisation that there might have been any misjudgment. Some basic self-reflection skills seemed to be missing on this occasion, skills which should be essential in any educational environment.

Physical isolation should not mean cultural isolation, and schools should not encourage insularity – while needing to reflect the needs of the immediate community, the school also has a duty to prepare their youngsters for the world.

Science catches up with common sense

And the world is moving on. Social values do not remain static, and the way we regard animals is evolving as fast as any new technology.

Modern science is reporting almost daily examples that show animals have more to teach us alive than dead. All animals have behavioural and psychological needs as much as physical needs. They are intelligent, have emotions and have complex social behaviours. In fact, scientists are discovering that we really don’t know much about our fellow beings on this earth.

Animals feel pain and suffer, and violence to animals is not different to any other kind of violence. Increasingly studies are pointing to the connection between animal abuse and other violent acts.

It is easy to accuse city folk of anthropomorphism, to say we give human traits to our pets, but this is a cheap shot. Animals are individuals with their own personalities and, as anyone with a companion animal will tell you, this is just common sense. Scientists are just now catching up with our common sense.

In the ‘‘rural-urban divide’’ it is farmers who are growing out of touch with common sense. They are also growing out of touch with their customers.

Farmers are out of touch

The majority of the population live in urban environments, and it is up to producers to reach out. Concern for animal welfare is only going to increase, much like the environmental issues that now dominate public discourse.

I strongly encourage farmers to tell their own stories, to talk about the good work being done, and give examples. Farmers themselves need to explain the ‘‘realities of rural production’’.

If there is a disconnect between city and country then it is because these stories are not being told. And there is in fact a good reason why farmers may not want them told: the reality is often not clean and green, or kind and respectful, and in fact the more city folk realise what is actually happening down on the farm the bigger the chance of backlash.

It is not so easy to be both ‘‘caring and practical’’ when it comes to animals – there can be a conflict between the two, and when the bills need to be paid, ‘‘caring’’ can get in the way.

Is the wider public ready to watch images of bobby calves being pulled from their mothers and sent to slaughter at five days old so we can drink their mothers’ milk? Or to vie

w one-day-old male chicks getting chopped up in macerators, because they are deemed waste products in the egg industry?

Systemic cruelty

There are dark corners within New Zealand farming, and the worst example is the growth of factory farming. These are legal acts of cruelty, practices such as the use of cages for layer hens; the selective breeding of chickens raised for meat, turning them into genetic freaks; and the continued barren confinement of pigs.

Attitudes may have moved on, but we still live with the production systems designed in previous decades. In factory farming animals are manipulated physically, sexually, and genetically, for our economic purposes.

 

A new relationship

This week in his release of the Government’s animal welfare strategy document, Minister for Primary Industries David Carter said, “Animal welfare matters. It matters because how we treat animals says something important about us as a society.” Animal welfare is something integral to ourselves as New Zealanders.

We are a first-world nation thanks to animal agriculture, there’s no denying that. Britain became a powerful empire on the back of the slave trade too. But at certain times in our history there are opportunities to redefine ourselves, and I look forward to the day when New Zealand redefines its relationship with animals.

Eliot Pryor, SAFE Campaign director

 

The Animal  Welfare Act review 2012

When the new Animal Welfare Act (AWA) was introduced in 2000, a sense of optimism was felt in the animal welfare community. The new AWA replaced the Animals Protection Act, written in 1962. The old Act was a complete failure for animals as it did not recognise their most basic needs and was near impossible to enforce.

The new AWA promised to remedy the old Act’s failings and provide better protection for animals by placing more responsibility on ‘owners’ of animals and setting minimum standards of care via newly established welfare codes. Of particular interest to SAFE was Section 10 of the Act, requiring that animals must have the ability to display normal behaviour. Surely, this would bring an end to some of the worst factory farming practices such as battery hen farming, pig crates and other practices where the animals clearly could not display any of their normal behaviour?

We could not have been more wrong! Instead of protecting animals, the Act had so many deliberately built-in loopholes that it became, in fact, a protector of commercial animal abusers. Under this Act, more hens were crammed in battery cages than ever before, pigs continued to be incarcerated for life in narrow metal crates and meat chickens were kept at a stocking density of 20 birds per square metre. The new Act also failed animals used in research and those used in the entertainment industries. The codes of welfare developed under the Act not only undermined the very principles of the Act but also made any meaningful enforcement near impossible.

SAFE calls for changes

After 12 years of abject failure the AWA is under review this year and SAFE will be making a substantial submission to demand significant change.

We want to see the establishment of an independent Commission for Animals, we want breaches of welfare codes to become offences, a ban on practices that do not meet the obligations of the Act such as battery hen farming, a complete overhaul of animal ethics committees that oversee animal experimentation and meaningful protection for wild animals that are hunted or considered as pests.

The Government will be calling for public submissions in August and SAFE will ask its supporters to speak out for animals during this time. SAFE will show good faith by participating in the review process even though we are highly skeptical about the motivation behind the review. From past experience we know that the animal-using industries have a strong influence on the decision-making process, thus ensuring that their exploitative practices continue unabated. We have no reason to believe that this year’s review will be any different so we must ensure that our voice becomes louder than those of the abusers.

Low standards

While the Government keeps repeating the same old mantra that New Zealand already has high animal welfare standards, those who care about animals know that this is simply not true. In the end the proof will be in the pudding. Will a new revised Animal Welfare Act ban practices that do not allow animals to express their normal behaviour? Will it stop laboratory animals from being subjected to experiments that cause high levels of suffering? Will it provide meaningful protection for animals hunted for ‘sport’ or targeted as ‘pests’?

SAFE will judge this review on the outcomes for animals, not on the spin put out by the Government or animal-exploiting industries. Real change for animals can be achieved but only if good people speak out.

Let’s make it happen

So stay in touch with SAFE, join us in the public consultation process and let our combined voices be heard; and then help us put the pressure on the politicians to make a real difference for animals!

Hans Kriek, SAFE Executive director

Last week three activists, representing grassroots animal advocacy groups under the umbrella of the Coalition to End Factory Farming, spent the day seven metres up in the air atop tripod structures. They were there to blockade the entrance to the biggest battery farm in the country, which is also the location of the government-funded colony battery cage trial.

Blocking the trucks

Aware of the likelihood of being arrested, they risked injury and hypothermia to protest against what they see as a huge injustice –  the cruel mistreatment of layer hens for the production of cheap eggs.

I was on location as part of their support team and watched as events unfolded. Whilst it was still dark and we were setting up we heard the sounds of 400,000 hens as the artificial lights turned on, which reminded us precisely of those we were there for.

It was an exciting day, with huge media and public interest and support.  Many hundreds of people did their bit to help the hens too, by sending emails directly to the Minister asking him to ban all cages for hens. I spent a lot of the time in the beaten-up old van being used as a media centre, doing some interviews and updating the virtual world. Not quite so glamorous!

The three activists stayed up longer than expected, and for most of the day blocked the entry of the trucks that would have been picking up the cage eggs. At the end of the day the three were released without charge.

Early morning blockade

We are defined by the way we treat animals

While SAFE will always use exposure of cruelty, education, lobbying and other forms of public outreach as its main tools, there will be times when protest is necessary to create a spark.

New Zealand has a strong tradition of civil disobedience. When we look back at the Springbok tour protesters we now see them as heroes who stood up for a just cause when they were called upon.

If colony cages are allowed to continue then public discord and protest will only continue, and potentially escalate. Animal welfare is growing in the public consciousness as an integral part of who we are, and it’s an issue that is fast becoming a touchstone for how we see ourselves as Kiwis. We believe animals should be treated with the respect and fairness we give to each other.

Colony cage, New Zealand

Most Kiwis would be shocked to see the reality of factory farming in this country. Chickens in cages so small they cannot flap their wings, pigs who can’t even turn around, animals unable to express even their most basic natural behaviour – it’s no kind of life.

While news media were attracted to the danger and excitement of the action, the protest was successful in refocussing attention on the cruelty of the proposed colony battery cages. What many journalists were surprised to hear was that the code review is the same one that was started in February last year, over a year ago. The welfare of caged hens is not a priority for this government.

Entrance locked

Industry spin

On Close Up that evening the industry’s response was to claim that cheap eggs were a necessary evil in order to provide eggs for the less well-off. However the present cost of cage eggs is suppressed at low levels because they do not account for animal welfare. Mass production of cruel eggs are not a public service to fight poverty, but rather to provide huge profits for the big egg producers –  cage eggs still represent 88% of national production. See my previous post for more thoughts on this topic.

Industry representatives also tried to explain away the difference between the undercover footage of colony battery cages exposed on Campbell Livein March, and the nice showreel provided by the industry. It was said the activists disturbed the animals, but even if this was true, what shocks me, and I suspect most people that see the reality, is the intense overcrowding of the cages. There really is no space for the hens to move without disturbing another bird. A colony battery cage looks just like any standard battery cage.

Cheap eggs

The industry continues to deny media access with cameras, and this was the reason for obtaining and exposing the footage. Factory farming can only exist when it is kept hidden.

At the end of the day

Consumers decide

Of course this protest was just for a day – today and every other day those trucks pick up the eggs and deliver them to your local supermarket, where our friends, neighbours, colleagues and acquaintances buy them. It’s in the hands of each individual to end battery cages, and all factory farming. Help spread the word of cage-egg cruelty.

Eliot Pryor, SAFE Campaign director

Nothing shows how crazy our relationship with animals is, than the first day of the duck hunting season.

For a start, what do you think of someone who gets their thrills out of shooting animals? What should we do – lock them up, or put a photo of them in the local paper?

SAFE will always be outspoken about the carnage of duck hunting, and this season, (opening 5 May), we will again be calling for an end to duck shooting. Research conducted overseas indicates that duck shooters fail to kill up to a third of the birds outright, merely injuring them. SAFE believes this means as many as 275,000 birds, including geese, swans and native ducks, may be left crippled or left to die a slow and agonising death.

On the other side of the fence, Fish and Game are actively trying to recruit more young people into the killing fields, as their members are getting older, and their ‘sport’ is declining. You have to ask, what kind of outdoor education is it to shove a gun in a kid’s hand and tell them to shoot native wildlife?

Shooting native birds

It’s crazy, but some native birds are legal game birds. The grey duck (pārera) is in the gun’s sights, it’s open season on the paradise shellduck (pūtangitangi), and the shoveler (kuruwhengu) is ‘fair game’.

We call some birds ‘pests’, and other pets, and others national icons. It all depends on your point of view. We breed non-native birds, such as pheasants, release them into the countryside and then shoot them. Canadian geese can now be shot (or clubbed) all year round without a permit.

Of course people with guns also break the law at times: for example, it has been recently reported that up north kereru are being hunted, despite their being endangered and the possibility of a $100,000 fine for the hunter if caught.

Blood sport

Hunters themselves get hurt, and sometimes killed. Or kill innocent bystanders.

There’s no question hunting in New Zealand is somehow tied up with national identity. There’s a perception that it’s all about good keen mates heading into the bush and providing food for their families. However duck hunting is definitely for the ‘sport’ of it, and for most participants it’s just a ‘fun’ day out. I like the quote, “hunting is not a sport. In a sport, both sides should know they’re in the game” (Paul Rodriguez, Mexican comedian).

It’s basically a blood sport for kiwi males to let loose in the bush. And it’s not about conservation, as hunters have an interest in maintaining ‘game animal’ numbers.

Crazy story

There’s a good article in the latest National Geographic describing how a whole range of exotic animals were introduced to New Zealand by local ‘acclimatisation societies’, groups of colonists importing new species to be ‘game’ to this country without large mammals. It’s a crazy story!

Some of my best friends would defend hunting as an ethical choice. For example my brother-in-law goes hunting, and stocks the freezer at home, instead of buying freeze-packed meat from the supermarket.

Sure it’s a great thing to aim to control where your food comes from, but then to bring yourself to kill an animal – what kind of karma is there in that? And why take a photo with the dead animal afterwards?

Eliot Pryor, SAFE Campaign director

Just recently leading international beauty companies Avon and Estee Lauder (who claim to be cruelty free) were outed as testing their products on animals. The two, who’d previously claimed to have a long-standing policy against animal testing, are now paying for it to be done in Chinese government labs.

It is unclear how long this has been going on, but what the story illustrates is that finding companies that have genuine non-animal testing policies can be frustrating as some make misleading claims – for example a company may say ‘Finished product not tested on animals’ or ‘not tested on animals’, which means the ingredients could well be! Avon had even claimed, ‘Avon does not test products or ingredients on animals, nor do we request others to do so on our behalf’ whilst admitting in correspondence and on their global website that they carry out toxicity testing on animals.

UK group Uncaged says that Avon’s refusal to stop animal testing is due to their desire to be able to incorporate new chemicals into their products, as they believe innovation will maximise their profits. This despite the fact that there are already 8000 ingredients in existence – more than enough!

Shopping you can trust

So this begs the question, how can you truly trust a statement that a company is not performing cruel and painful experiments on animals? Well, of course there’s SAFE Shopper, SAFE’s own guide to products available in New Zealand that are not tested on animals. There’s a huge range and products are available everywhere you’d usually shop, from the supermarket to online and pharmacies. Check out the list here and download your free wallet sized booklet. If any companies you know of are not listed on SAFE Shopper you can also send them SAFE’s handy letter and ask them to apply.

And it also pays to be a ‘cruelty free detective’ when you’re out shopping, so you can learn to see past wording that seeks to give the impression that a company is not hurting animals for the sake of a new lipstick or shampoo. Here’s SAFE’s handy guide to spotting companies that test on animals:

How to be a ‘Cruelty Free Detective’

Just because a company says ‘against testing on animals’ it doesn’t mean they really don’t do it. Confused? Wonder no longer! To see through those marketing ploys, first read the label carefully.

1. No mention

Of course, if you look at a product that makes no mention of animal testing – assume that means they do. Ethical shopping is big business and companies are keen to hook your business, so if they don’t test they’ll say so.

2. ‘No product testing’

However, we also need to be aware and on the lookout for suspiciously worded or ambiguous statements. For example, according to Uncaged, Clarins says:

“In 1987, Clarins was the first French company to cease product testing on animals.”

Notice that they specifically mention ‘product’ testing and not ingredients?

3. ‘No ingredient testing’

Avon says: “Avon does not test products or ingredients on animals, nor do we request others to do so on our behalf. Avon will conduct animal testing only when required by law.”

This statement seems quite clear at first glance –they don’t test on animals. BUT they may still buy new ingredients that have been tested on animals, therefore benefiting from animal testing.

4. Random bunnies

Watch out for random bunny logos, too – as there are no laws surrounding animal testing statements in New Zealand many companies just place their own bunny logo on their products whilst not adhering to any kind of cruelty free scheme’s requirements!

Don’t touch!

So what companies should you take special care to avoid? According to PETA the big three to watch out for are Unilever, Johnson and Johnson and Proctor and Gamble. They make a huge number of everyday products you might not even know were manufactured by them.

In New Zealand Unilever sells (amongst others) Dove, Impulse, Lynx, Lux, Pears, Rexona, Sunsilk, Vaseline, Domestos, Surf, Persil and Jif.

Proctor and Gamble manufactures Gillette, Head and Shoulders, Herbal Essences, Nice ‘n Easy, Olay, Pantene, Max Factor and Wella.

Johnson and Johnson sells Aveeno, Listerine, Baby Lotion, Roc, Neutrogena and Piz Buin. This is just a selection of their products. For more information and a guide to other companies to boycott to help animals, please check out PETA’s list.

Vote with your wallet and say no to cruel animal testing!

Mandy Carter, SAFE Campaign manager

Flippant comments about battery hens made by Act MP Hilary Calvert got the animal and political world talking over the last few days. Ms Calvert made her comments on TVNZ’s Back Benchers and outraged animal welfare advocates and her colleagues in one fowl swoop, (pun intended). SAFE’s representative and Board member, Debra Ashton, asked the panel of politicians if their party would ban battery hen cages within ten years, Calvert replied:

“No… and I don’t care if they display the characteristics of chopping their heads off and running around the garden without their heads either. We care about people ahead of silly little chickens.”

She further aggravated the situation by randomly calling out “pigs is good” several times and then making the inaccurate statements that free range chickens require antibiotics and that hens were better off inside sheds.

Watching the show live on television, I could not help but be outraged and amused at the same time.

Of course Calvert’s comments were offensive and ignorant but it was her demeanor I found Hilaryous, (pun intended). She was shrill, wide-eyed and oh so out of her depth. The contrast of her amateur performance next to a very slick Labour’s David Cunliffe could not have been greater. Not that I thought much of his comments either, slick is one thing, saying something meaningful is another.

The National MP present was so bland that I can’t even remember his name. The National MPs comments were as meaningless as Labour’s and it is sad that our main parties just can’t get their act together on animal welfare issues.

The only shining light was Green MP Sue Kedgley who once again showed that being compassionate and a politician can go together.

Calvert’s outrageous behaviour upset many who care about animals but I’d rather see an MP express honest views, no matter how unpalatable they are, than have to listen to the meaningless spin so often used by other politicians. At least now we know who definitely not to vote for!

The fall out for Calvert was immediate, dozens of letters and emails were sent to her and fellow Act MPs and it was soon clear that she was out on her own. Colleagues Hon John Banks and Hon Rodney Hide quickly distanced themselves from her and Calvert had no other option to apologise for her insensitive remarks. Given that her earlier comments seem to have come from a raw honest place, it is hard to believe the sincerity of the apology especially as she is still clear about not wanting to ban battery hen cages.

Calvert now suggests that the best way to stop this cruel practice (glad that she now recognises this) is by getting people to stop buying battery eggs. This is a cop out however. Battery cages are in breach of the Animal Welfare Act and therefore should be banned. Given Calvert is a lawyer she surely must recognise this. Get your Act together (pun intended) Hilary and support a swift phase out of battery hen cages. Now that would be a real apology!

Click here to watch Back Benchers (skip to chapter 2)

SAFE director Hans Kriek has spent the past 25 years campaigning against battery hen farming and is considered to be New Zealand’s most outspoken and respected advocate for animals.